No. 78 | Roman Theological Forum | Article Index | Study Program | November 1998 |
by John F. McCarthy
PART II. HISTORICAL CRITICISM AS AN HISTORICAL METHOD26And Terah (Thare) lived seventy years and begot Abram and Nahor (Nachor) and Haran (Aran). 27And these are the generations of Terah: Terah begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran. And Haran begot Lot. 28And Haran died before the face of Terah his father in the land of his nativity in Ur of the Chaldees. 29And Abram and Nahor took wives to themselves: the name of Abram's wife (was) Sarai; and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah (Melcha), daughter of Haran, father of Milcah and father of Iscah (Jescha).33. Gunkel distinguishes a "difficulty" in the passage in this that Abram, "the first-born and honored patriarch" of the Israelites, is presented as having married Sarai, whose name in Hebrew means "princess," while Nahor, who is secondary and outside of the Israelite tradition, is said to have taken to wife Milcah, whose name in Hebrew means "queen." The Hebrew poets who fashioned this account would hardly have imagined their patriarch as married to the lesser woman or to be lesser in station himself. Gunkel suggests that this problem would be resolved "if one were to assume the Babylonian origin of the names," inasmuch as the Hebrew name Sarah ("princess") resembles the Babylonian word šarratu ("queen"), while the Hebrew name Milcah ("queen") resembles the Babylonian word malkatu ("princess"). Gunkel notes that in Babylonian mythology Šarratu is the goddess-wife of Sin, the moon-god of the city of Haran, while Malkatu is the name of his daughter. Hence, reasons Gunkel, a story about the Babylonian gods may have been turned by Hebrew poets into a story about the founding of the Israelite people, with Abram substituting for the moon-god Sin. Gunkel eases the shock of this astounding revelation by assuring Christian and Jewish believers that the pagan origin of the story "would have been long forgotten in the current tradition." 11